No win no fee

  • No up-front costs
  • Free Legal Advice 24/7

FREE Call For An Instant Claim
Assessment: 1800 958 498

Click to Call: 1800 958 498

 

Perry v Killmier & Anor - what is a defacto relationship in a dependency claim ?

In the case of Perry v Killmeir & Anor, the Court of Appeal considered what constituted a defacto relationship in the case of a dependency claim.

Mr Perry's partner was fatally injured in a motor vehicle accident in June 2007.   Mr Perry and his deceased partner had been residing together however had separate bank accounts and finances.  The Court at first instance also considered that Mr Perry appeared to have little involvment with the children of his deceased partner, as he seemed to be unaware of what the children did, and there was an attitude of "what's mine is mine and what's yours is yours" in the relationship, also indicating a lack of commitment.  The Court also considered that the decision to put off their marriage until they first purchased a house, also indicated a lack of commitment to the relatiionship.

The Court of Appeal had to decide the essential elements of a de facto partnershipand whether Mr Perry could recover dependency damages as a result of a less than traditional relationship.

In making their decision, the Court had to consider the provisions of s32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act which sets out numerous indicators of whether or not a couple were, as at the date of the death, living together as a couple “on a genuine domestic basis”.

The Court of Appeal determined that the "primary judge failed to give proper regard to all demonstrated elements of a true domestic relationship".  Justice Muir said in the lead judgment that "it is correct that the couple were in no hurry to pool resources... but the deceased and the appellant were of mature age and used to their independence. The appellant had the needs of his mother to consider and the deceased had three children.... What was being postponed was marriage not the continuance of teh defacto relationship.".

The court allowed the appeal and ordered that dependency damages assessed by the trial judge at $281,000, be paid by the CTP insurer, Suncorp.

 

Perry v Killmier & Anor [2014] QCA 064 Muir and Gotterson JJA and Applegarth J 04/04/2014

 

 

 

Free Claim Assessment

Not sure if you have a valid claim? Complete our Free Claim Assessment Form and we'll get back to you to discuss your claim eligibility.

Request Free Claim Assessment

Servicing Claims All Over Queensland

  • Gold Coast/Brisbane
  • Rockhampton/Emerald
  • Mackay/Townsville/Mt Isa
  • Cairns/Sunshine Coast
  • Toowoomba/Gladstone
  • Longreach/Beenleigh
  • Wide-Bay Region

No Win. No Fee.

We believe the pursuit of a fair legal outcome should be available to everyone – so we provide our clients with a NO WIN NO FEE Guarantee and the promise of NO up-front fees or costs.